“Not Having Weapons of Mass Destruction Was a Significant Disappointment”

george_bushI don’t think that’s what President Bush meant.  But it was still funny, in a nauseating way, to hear at his last news conference.

And I’m pretty sure his use of the term misunderestimated was intentional, in that he thinks it’s a real word.

If – despite his gnarled rhetoric – you still believe in President Bush then don’t go here.  You won’t find the kindness or praise you seek for him.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Not Having Weapons of Mass Destruction Was a Significant Disappointment”

  1. Brad says:

    That was funny that he said that. It’s like, “Aww! We weren’t going to die in a bloody nuclear war after all. Dang!” 😀

  2. Becky says:

    That line caught my attention too.

  3. Elvira says:

    Watching Bush at a press conference was always so painful. What’s shocks and awes me now is listening to our president-elect speak in full sentences, even paragraphs, using Webster sanctioned polysyllabic words! Accurately!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: