Paul and the Romans

The Catholic church needs to dumb it down a little. Just a little. Okay, maybe a lot.

As much as I love the Mass and some of the tradition that goes along with it, the Vatican II Council made a big mistake when it opted for the vernacular to bring the Mass to the people. It should also have offered explanations.

Explanations for the readings prior to each reading, so that people would know what the readings were really about.

Take this Sunday’s second reading, from Paul to the Romans. On a difficulty scale of one to ten this reading is a twelve, with a sentence structure so foreign (read: ungrammatical) that it is impossible to decipher by just listening to it. The congregation’s eyes collectively glazed over. I should know. I was the lector reading it to them, and I studied it hard to get the inflection and oratory as meaningful as possible.

So what was the point? It would only take an additional 60 seconds to provide an explanation of the context and meaning of the reading so that the congregation would more fully grasp what the reading was about. I wanted to do this; our priest basically (but nicely) said no.

And before chiding me by claiming that if one really wanted to get more out of the reading that they would study it beforehand, I say that obligations aside, the Church teaches us to be all-embracing, not elitist. There are many, myself included, who need and want an explanation of the more difficult passages of the Bible, and Paul’s letters happen to be almost entirely of that nature.

If the Church is going to continue feeding us snippets, it needs to provide us with context for that snippet.  Otherwise, we won’t fully appreciate the meaning.


2 Responses to Paul and the Romans

  1. rhondab1 says:

    I understand where you are. That is the reason i choose not to go to church. In their defense, they have done a great job of bringing many facets of other religions into play for balance in one’s life. The problem for me was that I did not feel spiritual, that I needed more. There was a time when there was a more spiritual aspect in the church. Perhaps if they would get back to that, their numbers would grow again. When one does not have understanding, they are lost. In the tradition of the church, it was steeped in mysticism. Unfortunately, they thought it was for the higher echelon of the church and not for the flock. I think you may be starting on your own spiritual path. I wish you much luck. Namaste.

    Rhonda Brackett

  2. Joseph R. says:

    “Take this Sunday’s second reading, from Paul to the Romans.”
    Exact reference, please (so we know what you are talking about).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: